Tactile Media Interfaces and the Re-materialization of Digital Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/9sq7zb02Keywords:
Tactile Media, Haptic Interfaces, Re-materialization, Digital Experience, Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs), Embodied Interaction, Phenomenology, Media ArtAbstract
The prevailing narrative of digital modernity has long been one of dematerialization-the abstraction of physical objects and interactions into weightless, seamless data. This paper argues for a paradigm shift, contending that we are witnessing a significant re-materialization of the digital experience, driven by the proliferation of tactile media interfaces. These interfaces, which engage the human haptic system as a core channel for communication and expression, are re-embedding digital information within physical, sensory, and often affective contexts. Moving beyond the visual-centric and touchscreen-based models of interaction, this study explores a spectrum of emerging technologies-from haptic wearables and shape-changing displays to tangible user interfaces (TUIs) and bio-responsive art-that foreground texture, pressure, temperature, and kinesthetic force. Through a critical analysis of theoretical frameworks in media studies, phenomenology, and human-computer interaction (HCI), combined with detailed case studies of contemporary art and design projects, this paper investigates how tactile interfaces are reconfiguring our relationship with digital information. It posits that this re-materialization is not a return to a pre-digital materiality but the creation of a new, hybrid material-digital stratum. Key findings indicate that this shift fosters deeper embodied cognition, enhances affective engagement, and introduces a new aesthetic and critical language for digital art. However, it also raises crucial questions about accessibility, the commodification of haptic data, and the potential for new forms of sensory control. This research concludes that tactile media interfaces represent a fundamental re-orientation of visual culture, one that demands we feel, as well as see, the digital future.
References
[1]Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994610
[2]Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
[3]Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
[4]Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97) (pp. 234–241). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715
[5]Follmer, S., Leithinger, D., & Olwal, A. (2013). inFORM: Dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13) (pp. 417–426). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032
[6]Jordà, S., Geiger, G., Alonso, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2007). The reacTable: Exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07) (pp. 139–146). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226998
[7]Catts, O., & Zurr, I. (2002). Growing semi-living sculptures: The tissue culture & art project. Leonardo, 35(4), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409402760181123
[8]Ernst, W. (2013). Digital memory and the archive. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816677665.001.0001
[9]Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
[10]Schiphorst, T. (2009). Soft(n): Toward a somaesthetics of touch. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2427–2438). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520345
[11]Agre, P. E. (1997). Computation and human experience. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571169
[12]Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418
[13]Obrist, M., Subramanian, S., Gatti, E., Long, B., & Carter, T. (2015). Emotions mediated through mid-air haptics. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15) (pp. 2053–2062). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702361
[14]Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91) (pp. 79–84). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856
[15]Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2013). Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. *ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20*(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442113
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Harris Anne (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.